“Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” the court said, adding that its decision has little to do with policy and politics. “This holding has nothing at all to do with whether the proposed ballroom is desirable, or not, as a matter of policy. This ruling does not even necessarily mean that the Defendants may not ultimately construct the ballroom.”
Recent Posts
- Wetlands Regulation After Sackett
- Bengtson’s Pumpkin Farm E. coli Outbreak: Five Sick, Petting Zoo Closed, Animals to Be Sampled Monday. What We Know, What We Don’t, and the Questions the Compendium Says Investigators Should Be Asking.
- 'This is all voluntary': Attorney for disputed federal prosecutor resisting Trump's firing tells 9th Circuit that federal law protects the Senate's 'advice and consent' power
- 'No constitutional issues': 5th Circuit rules in favor of ICE's indefinite detention policy, says immigrants are subject to rules 'that would be unacceptable if applied to citizens'
- How to Stay in Touch With Clients and Prospects When You Don’t Know What to Say
Recent Comments