Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Montana Ban Would Strike at Political Spending, and the Supreme Court; A measure aimed at stemming the tide of corporate money in politics will be on the November ballot; Opponents say it violates a high court ruling”: Neil Vigdor of The New York Times has this report.
“Ninth Circuit overturns order requiring Oregon to house transgender women in women’s prisons; A three-judge panel made up of Trump appointees scolded a magistrate judge for relying on ‘stale statistics’ and engaging in ‘baseless speculation’”: Hillel Aron of Courthouse News Service has this report.
“Blanche’s Political Campaigning Breaks an Ethical Norm Going Back to Watergate; The attorney general’s campaign politicking for Republicans adds to the degradation of post-Watergate values at the Justice Department”: Charlie Savage of The New York Times has this news analysis.
“Missouri election map hearing could tee up fresh Supreme Court scrutiny; Justices have already weighed in twice on the fate of the gerrymandered map, which would give Missouri Republicans an edge in seven U.S. House districts, compared to one for Democrats”: Joe Harris of Courthouse News Service has this report.
“Barrett Sidesteps Question About Trump Attacks on Supreme Court”: Holly Barker and Jordan Fischer of Bloomberg Law have this report.
“Justice Sotomayor concerned Americans may not be able to ‘keep’ republic”: Randy Krehbiel of The Tulsa World has this report.
The post How Appealing Weekly Roundup appeared first on Above the Law.
Recent Comments