\n\n

As of October 15, 2026, the FDA’s table of active outbreak investigations counts 50 people sick with E. coliO157:H7 in an outbreak the FDA and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service have tied to ready-to-eat, multi-ingredient chicken wraps. That is up from 38 a week ago and double the 25 the FDA posted when it opened the file on September 23. Three weeks in, neither agency has named the brand, the manufacturer, the retailer or the states where people got sick, and no recall appears on the table. On October 15, Marler Clark filed the first lawsuit in the outbreak, in federal court in Los Angeles, against Trader Joe’s Company on behalf of a North Carolina woman and a Massachusetts woman who were hospitalized after eating Trader Joe’s Tarragon Chicken Salad Wraps bought in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and Allston, Massachusetts.

What changed on the FDA’s table today

One number moved. The case count for FDA reference 1421, which also carries USDA-FSIS number 2026-04 because the product contains chicken, went from 38 to 50. Nothing else on the row changed. The product column still reads “Multi-ingredient wrap with chicken (suspect).” The outbreak is still listed as ongoing. Traceback, on-site inspection and sampling are all checked, with no word on what is being traced, where the inspection is or what is being tested. The recall column is still blank because, in the FDA’s words, the wraps were “proactively removed from the market before the link to the outbreak was confirmed” and are past their shelf life. The agencies say they are looking at possible contamination at the ingredient level, and Food Safety News reports that USDA is working to determine whether the chicken in the wraps went into other products. There is no hospitalization count, no HUS count, no ages and no states, and as far as I can find, the CDC has not posted an investigation notice.

Fifty is the number of people whose stool samples were cultured, sequenced and matched to the outbreak strain. The CDC’s own estimate is that for every reported E. coli O157 case, about 26 go unreported. The wraps are gone, but the count keeps rising because people who ate them in late August and September are still working their way through doctors, labs and state health departments.

What the first lawsuit says

The complaint is Gottlieb and Bright v. Trader Joe’s Company, No. 2:26-cv-12017, filed October 15, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, where Trader Joe’s has its headquarters. The plaintiffs are Gayle Gottlieb of Pembroke, North Carolina, and Meaghan Egan Bright of Somerville, Massachusetts. They are represented by Frederic L. Gordon of Pasadena and by Ilana Korchia and me.

According to the complaint, Ms. Gottlieb bought three Tarragon Chicken Salad Wraps at the Trader Joe’s at 115 Sayebrook Parkway in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on August 23 and ate the first one for lunch on August 27. By August 30 she had bloody diarrhea and was in the emergency department at UNC Southeastern Hospital in Lumberton, North Carolina; on September 2 she was hospitalized at Scotland Memorial Hospital in Laurinburg. Her stool tested positive for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157, and the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health confirmed E. coli O157 and Shiga toxin 2. The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services classified her as a confirmed case in a multistate outbreak, assigned her CDC cluster code 2609MLEXH-2, and recorded the source of her illness in its own food-exposure record as a “wrap from Trader Joe’s.”

Ms. Bright bought a Tarragon Chicken Salad Wrap at the Trader Joe’s at 199 North Harvard Street in Allston, Massachusetts, on August 24 and ate it that day. She fell ill on August 27, began passing bloody diarrhea on August 30, went by ambulance to Massachusetts General Hospital and was hospitalized from August 31 through September 6. Her stool tested positive for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and the Somerville Board of Health and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health told her she was part of a cluster of STEC infections.

The complaint alleges, on information and belief, that Trader Joe’s is the company that pulled the wraps from sale before the link to the outbreak was confirmed, and that it did so because it had reason to believe the product was a food-safety risk. It pleads strict product liability, negligence, negligence per se and breach of implied warranty under California law. Two women in two states bought the same named product within a day of each other, got sick on the same schedule and were tied by their own health departments to the same outbreak. That is what a common-source exposure looks like.

Why the brand still matters when the product is already gone

The agencies’ position is that because the wraps are off the shelves and past their shelf life, there is nothing for consumers to do and therefore nothing to announce. I disagree, for four reasons.

First, doctors. A STEC infection that started in late August can still be in a hospital in October, and a child who ate a wrap can develop HUS a week after the diarrhea begins. Clinicians who know a specific product is involved ask the right question and order the right test.

Second, the sick. Fifty people have been told they are part of a multistate outbreak linked to an unnamed food. Our clients learned what they ate from their own receipts and their own health departments, not from the FDA or USDA. Everyone else who ate a chicken wrap and got sick in August or September deserves the same information.

Third, the ingredients. The FDA says it is looking at contamination at the ingredient level, and USDA is checking whether the chicken went into other products. The chicken, the lettuce, the dressing and the tortilla in a wrap come from different suppliers, and a contaminated ingredient does not stop at one product line. Naming the wrap is how the public learns what else that ingredient touched.

Fourth, the rules. When FSIS announces a recall, it names the establishment and posts a retail distribution list. A product that is “proactively removed” before a link is confirmed never becomes a recall, never gets a retail list and never gets a name. STOP Foodborne Illness has had a citizen petition pending at the FDA since February asking the agency to name firms implicated in outbreaks (Docket FDA-2026-P-1448); the FDA gave it an interim answer in July. I have a companion petition in draft. This outbreak is the argument for both.

We have been here before

In November 2013, FSIS and the FDA investigated an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak traced to ready-to-eat chicken salads and wraps made by Glass Onion Catering of Richmond, California, and sold at Trader Joe’s, Walgreens, Whole Foods and other stores in eight western states. The agencies named the maker and listed every product within four days of linking the illnesses to the food, published a retail list, and the count ended at 33 sick in four states. Marler Clark represented eleven of those people and named Trader Joe’s as a defendant in every case where the salad or wrap was bought at one of its stores. I said then that retailers need to be held accountable for what they sell. In 2015, Costco pulled its rotisserie chicken salad from every store while the investigation was still underway, and the CDC named the product and the store anyway, reporting 19 sick in seven states, two with HUS. Removal from the market was never a reason to keep the name quiet. It is now.

What should happen now

The FDA and FSIS should name the product and the retailer, publish the states, the hospitalizations and the HUS count, and say when the wraps were removed, by whom and why. The CDC should post an investigation notice; a 50-person O157:H7 outbreak with its own cluster code is not too small for one. FSIS should post its own 2026-04 page instead of a link back to the FDA’s table and say what it has learned about the chicken and where else it went. None of that requires a recall. It requires a decision that the public’s right to know does not expire with a shelf-life date.

Marler Clark represents Ms. Gottlieb and Ms. Bright and is investigating other illnesses in this outbreak. If you ate a chicken wrap in August or September and developed diarrhea, especially bloody diarrhea, see a doctor, ask for a stool test for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and report the illness to your local health department.

https://www.marlerblog.com/files/2026/10/Gottlieb-Bright-Complaint.pdf